Government
Insider Says
Bush Authorized 911 Attacks
From Thomas Buyea
09-17-2004
Keep in mind when reading this, that the man
being interviewed is no two-bit internet conspiracy buff.
Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen
Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz
for decades. This courageous man has risked his professional
reputation, and possibly his life, to get this information
out to people.
The following is from his latest visit to Alex Jones' radio
show.
Forwarded with Compliments of Free Voice of America (FVOA):
Accurate News and Interesting Commentary for Amerika's Huddled
Masses Yearning to Breathe Free.
Note: All
honor to Stanley Hilton for risking his life so that we may
know the truth of 9/11.
"This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered
operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally
authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder."
--Stanley Hilton
Alex Jones interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for
911 taxpayers' lawsuit
Alex
Jones Radio Show September 10, 2004 Transcription by 'RatCat'
AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole's chief of staff,
very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds
of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement
in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out - half of New Yorkers
think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us
for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton.
Stanley, it's great to have you on with us.
SH: Glad to be on.
AJ: We'll have to recap this when we start the next hour,
but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you've deposed
a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just
in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?
SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and
Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were
all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing
9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush
personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating
documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered
this event to happen in order to gain political advantage,
to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons
and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted
to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some
of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late
60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and
so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about
this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on
this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential
dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event.
So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35
years.
AJ: That's right. They were all Straussian followers of a
Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting it up here in
America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you've
got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim's
families involved.
SH: 7 billion, 7 billion
AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating
evidence you've got of them ordering the attack?
SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers' class action
lawsuit as well as a suit on behalf of the families and the
basic three arguments are they violated the Constitution by
ordering this event. And secondly that they [garbled] fraudulent
Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush
presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get
the Iraq war authorization. And, of course, he related it
to 9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and
all these lies.
AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we've got to break.
Let's come back and get into the evidence. BREAK
AJ: All right my friends, second hour, September 10th, 2004,
the anniversary of the globalist attack coming up tomorrow.
It's an amazing individual we have on the line. Bob Dole's
former chief of staff, political scientist, a lawyer, he went
to school with Rumsfeld and others, he wrote his thesis about
how to turn America into a dictatorship using a fake Pearl
Harbor attack. He's suing the U.S. government for carrying
out 9/11. He has hundreds of the victims' families signing
onto it - it's a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is Stanley Hilton.
I know that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles
and Rhode Island and Missouri and Florida and all over. Please
sir, recap what you were just stating and then let's get into
the new evidence. And then we'll get into why you are being
harassed by the FBI, as other FBI people are being harassed
who have been blowing the whistle on this. So, this is really
getting serious. Stanley, tell us all about it.
SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld,
Mueller, etc. for complicity in personally not only allowing
9/11 to happen but in ordering it. The hijackers we retained
and we had a witness who is married to one of them. The hijackers
were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid
by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country.
They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant
in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert
operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally
ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well
as witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence -
in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he
personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point,
there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared
to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th - when
those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear
the [garbled] words about this he listened to kids reading
the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal.
These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen
simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian
slip a few months later at a California press conference when
he said he had, quote, "seen on television the first
plane attack the first tower." And that could not be
possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated
video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government-ordered
thing. We are suing them under the Constitution for violating
Americans' rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent
Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress
to justify the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains.
And also, under the RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt
Organization Act, for being a corrupt entity. And I've been
harassed personally by the chief judge of the federal court
who is instructing me personally to drop this suit, threatened
to kick me off the court, after 30 years on the court. I've
been harassed by the FBI. My staff has been harassed and threatened.
My office has been broken into and this is the kind of government
we are dealing with.
AJ: Absolutely and now it has come out - five separate drills
of flying hijacked jets into buildings that morning - which
you told us about before it even broke in the Associated Press.
They were trying to get out ahead of you. You talked about
how you interviewed military people who were told it was a
drill that morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news
finally reported on it. Now, we've learned that all these
operations - I want to get into that, I want to talk about
the new incriminating evidence of ordering it and how they
had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the bunker controlling
this. That has even come out in the mainstream news but they
won't release the details of that, Stanley. But what type
of FBI harassment are you going through? SH: First of all,
my office was burglarized in San Francisco several months
ago. Files were gone through and some files were seized -
particularly the ones dealing with the lady that was married
to one of the hijackers. Fortunately, I had spare copies in
a hidden place so nothing disappeared permanently. But more
significantly, FBI agents have been harassing one of my staff
members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats
of indicting them. And it's just total harassment. They have
planted a spy, an undercover agent, in my organization, as
we just recently discovered. In other words, these are Nazi
Germany tactics. This is the kind of government you have in
this country. This is what Bush is all about.
AJ: Stay there, Stanley, Bob Dole's former chief of staff.
We'll come back after this quick break. Please stay with us.
BREAK
AJ: All right, eight minutes, 25 seconds into the second hour.
Stanley Hilton, political scientist, lawyer, Bob Dole's former
chief of staff, is suing the government for 7 billion dollars
for carrying out 9/11 and for racketeering. And he joins us
now. During the break, I first really did the big interview
with Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News.
And that interview got massive attention. And then he kind
of went underground for a while because a judge, we're going
to talk about that, ordered him to not do any more interviews.
And now he's back doing interviews. He's had his office broken
into, FBI threats and harassment. Bottom line, he has deposed
military individuals, wives of hijackers, you name it, it
was a government operation. It has even come out in mainstream
news, a piece here, a piece there. They had drills on 9/11,
that's why NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control of the
whole thing. Stanley Hilton has now gotten documents about
how Bush ordered the whole operation. And I'll tell you right
now, his life is in danger, folks. And he's got so much courage.
He went to school with these neocons at the University of
Chicago. He wrote his thesis on how the government could use
terrorist attacks to set up martial law. He is the man for
the time and folks wondered why he disappeared for a while
and just did his lawsuit and wasn't doing interviews, it was
because he was ordered to. Stanley, can you get into that
for us?
SH: I did an interview with you, Alex, back in March of 2003,
about a year and a half ago, and literally two weeks after
that, I was contacted by the emissary of the chief judge of
the federal court where I have the lawsuit. And I was warned
not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with
discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of months
ago and then I got on the air on some programs and some publicity
and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief judge
here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge
has been circulating communiques to the other federal judges
seeking anything negative she can get against me to try and
discipline me after I've been on the court here for 30 years
with no disciplinary problems at all. This is suddenly happening.
And her assistants who are on the committee of the court met
with me on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and threatened
me directly. They handed me a copy of the lawsuit and said
that the judge wants me to dismiss this. What's this? She
doesn't like the content of it. This is politically incorrect.
This is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400
plaintiffs, how am I going to dismiss this case? And they
threatened me directly and they said, "the next time
you'll be disciplined." And also they've threatened me
not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous.
AJ: It's all color of law. No direct orders, just all in your
face.
SH: They sent a letter out, and of course they deny it's because
of the political content of the suit but they told me directly
on the phone that it is because of this suit and this judge
is very, very angry, apparently has been in contact with Ashcroft's
Justice Department. I got a call from Ashcroft's Justice Department
a few months ago about this, demanding that I drop the suit,
threatening sanctions and all kinds of things. I refused to
drop it. AJ: Now let's go back over, you had them break into
your office, harassment. Let's go over that in detail.
SH: My office was broken into about 6 months ago. The file
cabinets - it was obvious they had been rifled through. Files
were stolen. Files dealing with this particular case and particularly
with the documents I had regarding the fact that the - some
of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the payroll
of the U.S. government as undercover FBI, CIA, double agents.
They are spying on Arab groups in the U.S. And, in effect,
all this led up to the effect that al Qaeda is a creation
of the George Bush administration, basically. That the entity
that he called al Qaeda is directly linked to George Bush.
And all this stuff was stolen. Fortunately, I had copies.
But this was just part of the harassment. The FBI has also
been harassing some of my assistants and has planted a spy
in our midst. And it is just outrageous that these Nazi tactics
are being used - and the obstruction of justice, these people
are criminals. And that's what's happening under the tremendous
pressure here to just drop it. Or to shut up now and just
go away.
AJ: Now, let's talk about what they want you to drop. Let's
talk about, without giving names, the people you deposed,
what really happened, the picture you've got. You said earlier
that Bush ordered this, they were simulating this which they
now admit there were simulations on that morning. Let's go
over what they don't want you to talk about, Stanley.
SH: We have evidence both documentary as well as witness sworn
statements from undercover former FBI agents, FBI informants,
etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the military
and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were
many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened.
Bush had seen this simulated on TV many times. He blurted
this out at a press conference in California a few months
after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen the first plane
hit the first building on the video. And that's not possible
because there was no official video of that. There was one
of the second plane not the first one. He had seen the first
one. We do have some incriminating documents that Bush personally
ordered 9/11 events. It was well planned. A FEMA official
has admitted on tape that he was there the night before -
September 10th, that is
AJ: And now Mayor Giuliani, a few months ago in the 911 Commission,
admitted that - Tripod II. They had their whole command post
already moved out of Building 7. Now, this is very, very important.
This is a key area of this whole event. You said months before
it came out on the CIA's own website and the Associated Press,
you said I deposed people. They said there were drills that
morning and exactly what happened, happening - that was the
smoke-screen for the stand-down. And then to get out ahead
of it, the CIA comes out and said yeah we were running a drill
that morning. Now, we've learned that five, possibly six,
were confirmed. Five of these - one drill with the exact same
thing happening that actually happened, at the exact same
time in the morning. That's why NORAD stood down with 24 different
blips on the screen. You've said this. You brought this up
first. Now, I know you can't get too much into detail but
can you tell us how you learned of this?
SH: I have interviewed individuals in NORAD and the Air Force.
I personally toured NORAD many years ago around the time that
I worked for Dole. I'm very familiar with the operations at
Cheyenne Mountain at Colorado Springs, where NORAD is. Individuals
that work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated this,
off the record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five
drills but at least 35 drills over at least two months before
September 11th. Everything was planned, the exact location
AJ: But five drills that day.
SH: That day, that day, and Bush thought it was a drill. That's
the only explanation for why he appeared nonchalant
AJ: We also had NORAD officers and civilian air traffic controllers
going, "Is this part of the exercise? Is this a drill?"
SH: Yes.
AJ: On the tapes and in TV interviews, they thought it was,
quote, a drill.
SH: That's right. That's exactly what I said long before it
became public. I've known about this since earlier in March
of '03, as I stated before. This was all planned. This was
a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the
order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty
of treason and mass murder. And now, obstruction of justice
by attempting to use a federal judge and FBI agents to inhibit
a legitimate civil lawsuit in this country, in federal court.
Even a chief judge in this court tried to harass and threaten
me personally for representing legitimate plaintiffs. And
they got Clinton for allegedly lying under oath about Paula
Jones and now - look what's happening now. And Ken Starr used
to be across from me in Duke Law School in the early `70s
and it?s interesting that he got away with trying to get Clinton
impeached, so we have a far worse criminal sitting in the
oval office today - somebody guilty of mass murder as well
as obstruction of justice.
AJ: Well, I mean look, they say they never heard of a plan
to fly planes into buildings - said it all over television
- Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft. And then we find
out they were running all these drills that morning. Even
if they weren't involved, that proves they were liars about
ever hearing of such a plan.
SH: Well, I'm trying to take their depositions - I've been
trying to take their depositions for months. They've been
trying to object to it. They will have to admit they were
either lying then or now. It's clearly perjury either way.
They are liars and perjurers; that's what they are. These
are the people that we have running this government and, of
course, they knew about it. How are they going to claim now
that they didn't know about these drills? Their idea is that
nobody knew anything. It's the old know-nothing mentality.
And how anybody considers this believable is beyond me.
AJ: All right, now people ask how could a huge organization,
how could the AWACs, how could the military let this happen;
whereas before, if your Cessna got off course for five minutes,
they would launch F-16s on you. It's real simple. It's what
Stanley Hilton said here a year and a half ago. It's what
came out in the news after that. The military, good people,
were told this was all a drill. And it was not a drill. And
ABC News admits that Cheney was in control of [?] out of the
White House [?] and that he ordered the military to quote
"do something." Our inside sources from Hilton and
others say it was a stand down and they admit they will not
release that under national security. Stanley?
SH: Well they are going to admit it, they're going to release
it in the court case because if you demand it under subpoena
powers and they must release it. And part of our lawsuit is
brought in the name of the U.S. because under the federal
fraudulent [Claims Act], we accuse the Bush Administration
of presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress. And under the
statutes of Title 31 of the U.S. code, they must release this
information. That's why they are trying to threaten me, harass
me, invade my office, steal my files, commit blatant obstruction
of justice and other crimes to try and prevent a legitimate
civil suit from exposing these criminals and their acts of
treason and mass murder.
AJ: I think you need to publicly tell folks that you are not
planning suicide. Would you like to tell folks that?
SH: (laughs) I'm not planning suicide. I've got family and
I'm not planning that but I don't like the threats I'm under
- but I can tell you this, it's taking a toll emotionally
on me and my staff. And particularly, when you get a threat
from the chief judge of your own court.
AJ: Why have you decided to go public again after a year of
being under the radar? SH: Because the more and more evidence
that I've been adducing over a year and a half has made it
so obvious to me that this was now without any doubt a government
operation and that it amounts to the biggest act of treason
and mass murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes
Benedict Arnold look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold
look like George Washington. I mean that's what we have -
a criminal and a traitor sitting in the White House pretending
he's a patriot, wrapping himself in the flag. And it's pretty
disgusting because the other side of the so-called opposition,
the Kerry camp is just saying nothing because they're afraid
to speak.
AJ: Stay right there. We'll be right back.
BREAK
AJ: Stanley Hilton will be with us for another 15 or 16 minutes.
Then he's got to go into court. Bob Dole's former chief of
staff, political scientist, lawyer, represents 400 plus plaintiffs
- most of them victims of 9/11. When I was in New York last
week, everybody I was talking to, I mean 90 plus percent of
them at ground zero - "I had family, I worked in the
buildings, my son's a Navy Seal - he called the night before
and said don't go to work." You know, all of this, and
then now they never had any idea - and it turns out they had
all these drills - and one drill of hijacked jets flying into
the World Trade Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.
That morning - come on people! And Stanley Hilton brought
all this out on this show before it was in the mainstream
news. And I was talking to him during the break. I mean, the
harassment, the moles, the threatening of his staff, the judge
threatening him. Stanley, let's get specifically into the
documents that you have now got that they have now been robbing
you for, that you luckily, thank God had copies. Specifically,
Bush ordering this. Can you get into that for us - ordering
9/11? SH: National Security Council classified documents which
[garbled] and it's was part of a series of documents that
were involved with the drill documents. This was all planned
- they had it on videotape. These planes were controlled by
remote control, as I stated previously a year and a half ago,
there's a system called Cyclops. There is a computer chip
in the nose of the plane and it enables the ground control,
the military ground control, to disable the pilot's control
of the plane and to control it and to fly it directly into
those towers. That's what happened. It's also a technology
used on what's called the Global Hawk, which is an aircraft
drone - a remote- controlled aircraft. And they were doing
it. We are talking about National Security Council classified
documents that clearly indicated that [garbled] had a green
light to order this to go and this is no drill. These drills
that were running were clearly a dress rehearsal and this
was a government operation. You wonder why these people are
trying to threaten people and trying to intimidate people
who have written this suit, I guess if you murdered 3000 of
your own citizens, in conjunction with the corrupt Royal family
of Saudi Arabia as Bush did. And if you then waste billions
more on a worthless garbage war in Iraq, I guess you've got
something to worry about and you want to threaten people to
prevent it from coming out.
AJ: I mean let's look at this. Not only are there dress rehearsals,
they are smoke screens so the good military stands down and
doesn't know what's happening. But it's now coming out, even
in mainstream news, that yes these drills were going on. Yes,
and some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets were
under remote control - this is decades old technology. In
1958, NORAD was [ ] old jets and using them for target practice.
Decades ago they flew jumbo jets from LA to Sidney Australia.
So since that's going on, everybody knows that. And it's the
same MO. Just like the first World Trade Center [bombing]
where they get two retarded men who followed this blind sheik
who had a tiny mosque above a pizza parlor. And they set them
up as the patsies. Then the FBI cooks the bomb, trains the
drivers. This informant goes, "You're not going to bomb
the building? They go "Yeah, we're letting it go forward."
He tapes them to protect themselves. The two retarded gentlemen,
thank God, didn't park it up against the column, as the FBI
instructed them to do, so it didn't bring down the tower -
because you have to be right up against the column. That doesn't
happen. Yet, it's the same thing with 9/11. You've got these
CIA agents, these Arabs, who were trained at U.S. military
bases, Pensacola Naval Air Station - mainstream media, out
creating their legends for this background. They're on board
the aircraft. My military sources say nerve gas kills everybody
on board the plane - nerve gas packets. Then they fly the
planes into buildings. From your inside sources, is that accurate?
SH: It's one of the things that we are looking into - that
nerve gas or something else disabled people. It's possible.
I can't say for sure to be honest with you
AJ: All you know is they were government agents and they were
on board and the planes were remote controlled.
SH: Yeah, it was basically a smokescreen. I mean, the events
of the hijackings, how someone snuck in those cutters, it
was a plant. It was like a classic decoy. I've got some military
background. And it's called decoy. It's a decoy operation.
You make the people focus on the decoy to avoid looking at
the real criminals. So they are focusing on these so-called
nineteen hijackers and saying, "Oh, it must have been
these Arabs. When, in fact, the guilty person is at 1600 Pennsylvania
Avenue - sitting in the oval office. That's the guilty person.
That's the one who authorized it. There is only one man who
could have authorized this operation and that's Bush. And
anyone at NORAD will tell you as I have been told personally
at NORAD in the war control room, there is only one man who
has the power to do this kind of thing and that's Bush. Even
though many believe he's a puppet. And I think in many ways
he is. The fact of the matter is where was [ ] Cheney, Rumsfeld
and these other traitors. The fact is Bush personally ordered
and he's guilty and liable and he's going to be re-elected
apparently because the media's asleep and [garbled] for Bush.
AJ: Well, the media is owned by the same military industrial
complex that carried out the attacks.
SH: Yeah, the media is only interested in maintaining the
official government fantasy that this was a little lone Arab.
These Arabs couldn't even steer that plane down a runway.
AJ: Stay there Stanley, final segment coming up. BREAK
AJ: Mr. Hilton, when you talk to these FBI agents, when you
talk to these military men and women, what's their attitude?
They've got to be pretty freaked out to have the big picture
and know what actually happened on 9/11.
SH: Yes, you know it's like clouds just before a thunderstorm
in the sense that they are sort of pregnant with rage. They
are just enraged at the criminal politicians who have perverted
and misused the government to murder its own citizens and
pursue these dubious political ends. And many of them, in
increasing numbers, are willing to talk and will talk under
subpoena - but only under subpoena because the official party
line of the government is shut up and don't talk to the trial
lawyer. But more and more, they are very outraged that part
of the government has done this to its own people, to its
own people. I mean you have to go back to Stalin to see something
- not even Hitler did this to his own people. You have to
look at Stalin who murdered the Kulaks, the Russians for his
own dubious gains. Also we've got - we have a Stalinist mentality
in this country. And, if these people pose as patriots and
wrap themselves in the flag, it's disgusting. I wanted also
to point out that the Japanese television network, Asahi,
is going to be airing a special on primetime tomorrow, on
September 11th. They interviewed me for eight hours a couple
of weeks ago. I'll be on that. I wish - of course, the America
media don't care so they are not going to care. But in Japan,
people are very serious in interviewing me and others. And
we have a website now, called deprogram.info, if more people
are interested: www.deprogram.info. But the other thing, I
just wanted to say that if anything happens to me - and I
don't know why - because I'm being threatened here now. And
it seems you can't bring a case in this country anymore against
criminals in power without being threatened. And this is how
they operate. The stakes are pretty high when you've got a
world historical level of treason and fraud by this government
against it's own people. I guess this is what you have to
expect.
AJ: Stanley, the globalists, the new world order crowd, definitely
intend to carry out more terror attacks. I know they would
have carried out more attacks if we wouldn't have done what
we've been up to, if you wouldn't have been out there boldly
speaking out and many others. And then their electronic Berlin
wall has a bunch of cracks in it now. Thanks to good people
like yourself and many others who are speaking out and telling
the truth. But do you think that they may carry out what they've
been hyping - a suitcase nuke attack, a biological release
to try to smokescreen all of this? I know it's a catch 22,
you've got to expose the murderers. We've got to get the word
out on this but some government people that I've talk to say,
"Yeah, but if you do that, they are going to go even
more hard core and must totally try to take over." But
I say regardless, they are already doing that. So what do
you say to that?
SH: Well, yeah, I think they have an agenda. They have contingency
plans. I think they are laying low now because there are an
increasing number of people, like myself, who are openly challenging
them and accusing them of criminal conduct. I think they would
have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think they're
planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters.
That's why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared unconstitutional
in this lawsuit also.
AJ: Let's talk about polls. In the beginning a patriot is
a scarce man, hated and feared, but in time when his cause
succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing
to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the barbwire
for us, or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for America.
But when you've got a Zogby poll, who is highly respected,
half of New Yorkers believe that the government was involved.
When you have a Canadian poll, 63% on average believe that
the U.S. government was involved. And some groups, as high
as 76% in polls believe the government was involved. European
polls, two- thirds show the same thing. We have German defense
ministers and technology ministers and another member of their
government now, three of them going public, known conservatives,
and progressives. You have an environment minister, Michael
Meacher, saying that if they didn't do it, they sure as hell
knew what was going on. Look, if anybody who is a thinking
person looks at the evidence, their official story is impossible.
Then you investigate and they are involved in it. Comments
to this massive awakening and what's happening.
SH: Well, I think that's why they want the Patriot Act to
suppress political dissent. They have to, they're anticipating,
they are not dumb individuals. I know these people personally,
Wolfowitz. These are criminal individuals but they are smart
and so they anticipated political dissent. And that's why,
like the Nazis, their forebears, and their blood brothers,
the Nazis and the Stalinists, they're all for political repression.
Every corrupt and criminal government has done this - they
suppress their own people: Nazi Germany, Communist Russia,
Mao Tse-Tung, that's why we have the Patriot Act. So it's
hand in hand. They had it planned to go right up to September
11th, this was all part of the plan. You have to do it. It
was part of my senior thesis. You must follow through the
terrorists attacks with a political suppression mechanism
in the law. And that's why they want Patriot I and Patriot
II and their plans are to continue launching more terrorist
attacks to justify even more repression. The goal is to make
this a one party dictatorship in this country, to pursue their
dubious ends with their blood brothers like the Saudi Royal
family. And also, historical blood brothers, such as the Nazi
Germany and the Communist Russian. That's the goal
AJ: You've got to go in just a minute or two. But I wanted
to also tell you about New York. Sound cannons that are used
in Iraq, they're against us. Men in black ski masks. 41,000
police, accredited media being arrested randomly. Children
being arrested, people in wheelchairs, 2000 plus people put
in a camp with barbwire fences inside with no bathrooms. You
had to have permission to go to the porta-potties. Police
screaming at you. It had nothing to do with terrorism. They
are openly setting the precedent for martial law.
SH: Well, that's right, the word terrorist is now being overly
broad and overly defined [garbled] and also, you know, it's
like the word communist was used for anything during the McCarthy
witch hunt. And anybody can be called a terrorist by Bush's
definition. But the irony is that the number one terrorist
in the world is living at the White House at the oval office
today. That's the real irony. For sheer hypocrisy, I think
he deserves the world prize and ought to be in the Ripley
book, Believe It or Not, and the Guinness book of world records
for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud.
AJ: Let me ask you a question on this because this is the
experience that I had. Watching television, watching the killers,
watching those that are guilty, stand up there as our saviors
is incredibly painful. It's like watching Ted Bundy being
the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to know
who these people are. To see them putting America in a shredder.
Now we are going to have forced psychological testing of every
American, forced drugging, you know Pan-American unions, I
mean it's just all happening, it's in our face, Stanley.
SH: Yeah, it's very disturbing and as one who has studied
the theory and concept of dictatorships, I personally interviewed
Albert Speer, who was Hitler's armaments minister. I interviewed
him in 1981 in Munich. And I've studied the psychology and
history of totalitarianism and there is no question that it's
very frightening. And it has, today, with high technology,
albeit for the first time in history, the chance of having
a world empire dominated by corrupt, technologically oriented
government - an elite government. And they've got now what
people like Napoleon and Hitler didn't have, which is the
technological means to dominate not only their own country
but others - the world.
AJ: The answer is to expose them as the terrorists, to show
how PNAC [Project for the New American Century] said we need
helpful Pearl Harbor events, to show how Northwoods called
for the exact 9/11-style attacks, to show their own plans.
And to force people to face this horror. What are they going
to do in a year or two when 80% of us, not half of us, know
the truth?
SH: Well, that's why they want repression and, then again,
the ancient old diversion, launch another terrorist attack
to get people to pitch it away. I mean who knows what they'll
do next. I mean their capacity for ingenious creation of these
events is sort of unraveled. I mean there is no limit. My
guess is they are going to try another stunt - maybe a stunt
just before the election to justify getting Bush reelected.
Although it seems like he is running against a straw man or
a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is they'll try some
other tactic to get people's attention away from 9/11 if it
gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for
the public to just lose interest because the public - and
it's like remember the Alamo, you know, people don't forget
things like that. To me it's like the Alamo, remember 9/11,
that ought to be the slogan for this outrageous act of treason.
That's what it is. It's not
AJ: We are at a crossroads, I don't think they anticipated
this much resistance, Stanley.
SH: Yeah, I hope they are truly wrong and as incompetent as
they are corrupt and guilty. That means their incompetence
is exceeded only by their corruption and their guilt. And
eventually, if enough people are going to get outraged enough,
these people in the bureaucracy and in the civil service and
our military, and eventually we can get people under subpoena
these individuals will be exposed.
AJ: Stanley, their whole operation hinges on us being naive
and not recognizing evil. This is what they got with Hitler
and others. People couldn't recognize evil so they continued
to repeat succumbing to it. We are recognizing it this time.
We are putting our lives, our treasure, our future on the
line for freedom because we cannot let these blood-thirsty
control freak terrorists capture us and use us and turn us
into the empire and have a draft and use us as their slaves
to invade the planet. And that's their PNAC plan. Stanley
Hilton, I know you've got to get to court. God bless you.
I want to thank you for being here with us today. Can we get
you back on next week?
SH: Sure, just give me a call.
AJ: God bless you my friend. Any closing comments?
SH: My closing comments would be, I think people ought to
just think about the consequence of having someone like Bush
in the White House and the danger for the future that these
sorts of individuals pose. This is not just a historical event
of the past. This is part of the plan and the camera is still
rolling. They have an agenda. These individuals are extremely
dangerous. They are armed and dangerous. They pose a clear
and dangerous threat to every freedom-loving person not only
American but in the whole world.
AJ: You are absolutely right Stanley Hilton. They have captured
the government. They have not captured the peoples' minds
and they are counting on us not facing up to it.
SH: And they are counting on the repressive Patriot Act and
threats and chief judges and FBI agents threatening people
who are exposing them. That's what they are counting on.
AJ: But you're not backing down are you, my friend.
SH: No, I'm not
AJ: Well, we all stand with you, my brother, and God bless
you.
SH: All right. Thank you.
To hear Alex's interview with Stanley Hilton -
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm
|
